1
This may seem odd to some parents, while others may agree that it was right thing to do. If we choose to ignore the obvious (i.e. speaking to the child about the danger of wild animals would change the dynamics of this story), and assume that this mother is of sound mind and has her child’s best interest and heart, I have two rational explanations as to why this mother warns Little Red Cap to stay on the path, to avoid falling and breaking the bottle.
(i) Very often parents try to shield their children from the harsh realities of life, especially when they are too young to fully comprehend the situation (or so the parent may think). They are some cases where parents do this because of the fear that they may do more injustice, than justice, by communicating “too much” to the child, and in other cases they (the parents) believe that kids are kids, and should do exactly as they are told, without a reason. This is usually the case with parents who are raised that way. An example of this is the fear many parents have with speaking to their children (even teenagers) about sex.
(ii)The author may be using this situation in the story to teach a lesson that is bigger than the story itself. The lesson being – if you stay on the right path, you will be able to accomplish any task no matter how difficult it may appear and if you don’t …(you know the story!!).
2.
In an odd way, this brings to mind the age-old question, “which comes first, the chicken or the egg?” Did the original author pen the story with sex and gender on his mind, or was it sincerely written as a fairy tale for children? Was sex and gender symbolism cleverly constructed into this fairy tale, or was this fairy tale manipulated to convey a “new” story? I honestly believe that you can find symbols of sex and gender in anything you want to. I also believe that, unless the original author said (or documented) that this was his intention, the person with the better argument wins.
I am not going to agree or disagree with their arguments. Instead I am going to argue that art (fairy tales included) is subject to interpretation, by the person viewing it. I agree that there may be standards, experts and even accepted beliefs, but what good are they to people ignorant of them? Point in case – if I do not know that the color red represents lust, passion and eroticism, because I never looked deep into the meaning of colors or even because in my culture it represents war, I may look past the apparent evidence of sexual symbolism.
Even when looking at the actions of the characters in this story in particular, in my opinion, each characters action aligns perfectly with what is expected of him/her. Mothers send kids visits to visit their parents, grandparents are usually older and more susceptible to illness, young kids are often curious and adventurous and wolves are known to be as dangerous as they are cunning. Any sex or gender here? Again, it depends on the reader!!
3.
I do not agree that the “wolf” in Aesop’s fables often plays a bystander who interacts with seeming innocents that misbehave. To agree that this is his role, will be unfair to such a formidable character. The wolf is the Dennis Rodman of fables; yes, his role paints him as the “bad guy,” but without him, there would be no finger pointing and, even worse, no lessons to learn. Believe me, the wolf takes one for the team- the team being Aesop and his readers.
Secretly I envy the wolf. He seldom comes off as the loser even if he is deceived. Not to mention, while the lamb and the sheep etc. are never resurrected, the wolf always survives to star in the next fable. Arrogant, sly, self-centered, respected, feared, seemingly intelligent, greedy…this guy is no different from the CEO of Bear Stearns, or even better, Donald Trump.
No comments:
Post a Comment